Posted by simon on 2012/01/12
Posted in Comment | Tagged With: Altavista, Ask Jeeves, Bing, Dogpile, Google, Webcrawler, Yahoo |
The search engine,when you think about it, is a pretty magical thing. Really, they are essentially full text searches of ultra-massive databases, serving mind-boggling numbers of queries every second.
And there are hundreds of them.
Google, of course, is the Big Daddy of them all, with 60% of the market. The impressively poorly named Bing has apparently overtaken Yahoo! for second place now. Which is a bit like a Honda Civic entering the Le Mans 24 hour and making its way up to second, simply because the competition keep running out of fuel. (Although the comparison feels a little unkind to Honda).
To be honest, Google’s recent integration of Google+ into its search doesn’t bother me. I don’t trust Google’s results, and haven’t for several years. For searching MSDN, for example, it does a very good job. And their record of reporting takedown notices to Chilling Effects is an excellent one.
The only problem is that Google is too intelligent a tool. When it comes to web search, I don’t really want to live in a bubble, surrounded by the familiar, mainly because I already have nearly all of the familiar bookmarked and backed up to Firefox Sync. What I do need is a search engine that doesn’t really care what I am looking for or why, and will just interpret the query the way I want it.
Of course, I remember way back in 1996, when WebCrawler was the big noise, and got unseated by the mighty Digital Equipment Corporation’s shiny new AltaVista (now, sadly, a Yahoo! front end, but I won’t go into the history of AltaVista right now). Lycos is still going, and for years I was a huge fan of Dogpile, but at the moment, my default search provider has become one that I’ve always – until recently – scorned:-
Ask Jeeves
Don’t laugh. It doesn’t have the reach of either Google or Bing, but that’s to my advantage – it has much less spam, better results, and I don’t have to think my way around Google’s algorithms to get the search results I actually want. With Google I frequently have to make two searches to find what I want – whereas with Jeeves it’s usually on the first page. (As an aside, I think Google’s integration of Google+ is great news… for Bing. It’ll erode the quality of Google’s results like nobody’s business.)
So… what the hell? Am I still living in 1996? Or am I just fed up with the “clever clever” search algorithms that actually just make Google and its ilk more and more distracting and irrelevant?
Jan 12
12
On Search Engines
Posted by simon on 2012/01/12
Posted in Comment | Tagged With: Altavista, Ask Jeeves, Bing, Dogpile, Google, Webcrawler, Yahoo | 1 Comment
The search engine,when you think about it, is a pretty magical thing. Really, they are essentially full text searches of ultra-massive databases, serving mind-boggling numbers of queries every second.
And there are hundreds of them.
Google, of course, is the Big Daddy of them all, with 60% of the market. The impressively poorly named Bing has apparently overtaken Yahoo! for second place now. Which is a bit like a Honda Civic entering the Le Mans 24 hour and making its way up to second, simply because the competition keep running out of fuel. (Although the comparison feels a little unkind to Honda).
To be honest, Google’s recent integration of Google+ into its search doesn’t bother me. I don’t trust Google’s results, and haven’t for several years. For searching MSDN, for example, it does a very good job. And their record of reporting takedown notices to Chilling Effects is an excellent one.
The only problem is that Google is too intelligent a tool. When it comes to web search, I don’t really want to live in a bubble, surrounded by the familiar, mainly because I already have nearly all of the familiar bookmarked and backed up to Firefox Sync. What I do need is a search engine that doesn’t really care what I am looking for or why, and will just interpret the query the way I want it.
Of course, I remember way back in 1996, when WebCrawler was the big noise, and got unseated by the mighty Digital Equipment Corporation’s shiny new AltaVista (now, sadly, a Yahoo! front end, but I won’t go into the history of AltaVista right now). Lycos is still going, and for years I was a huge fan of Dogpile, but at the moment, my default search provider has become one that I’ve always – until recently – scorned:-
Don’t laugh. It doesn’t have the reach of either Google or Bing, but that’s to my advantage – it has much less spam, better results, and I don’t have to think my way around Google’s algorithms to get the search results I actually want. With Google I frequently have to make two searches to find what I want – whereas with Jeeves it’s usually on the first page. (As an aside, I think Google’s integration of Google+ is great news… for Bing. It’ll erode the quality of Google’s results like nobody’s business.)
So… what the hell? Am I still living in 1996? Or am I just fed up with the “clever clever” search algorithms that actually just make Google and its ilk more and more distracting and irrelevant?